Jan 24 2012

Harness the Momentum of Synergy to Realize Change Goals

This is the last post in my series on developing synergistic work teams. I have been describing a four-phase model that includes Interacting, Appreciative Understanding, Integrating, and Implementing.

Phase IV: Implementing

Finally, all the hard work of communicating, and appreciating and merging divergent views begins to pay off. The synergy process I’ve been describing has many benefits: more

Dec 20 2011

Four Ways Communication Can Build Synergy in Work Teams

In this series, I’m discussing what I’ve learned about fostering synergy during major transformational initiatives.

If people have the willingness to forge their diverse perspectives into a synergistic alliance, the following sequence can be used to describe how they can work together to realize change. The four phases outlined are Interacting, Appreciative Understanding, Integrating, and Implementing.

Phase I: Interacting

A basic condition for synergy is that the key players must effectively interact with each other. If iron and nickel are never brought into contact with each other, the process of making steel is impossible. The same is true for people. For sponsors, agents, and targets; or practitioners and their clients to work synergistically, they must be able to communicate effectively.

People who attempt to work together, but who have little or no opportunity to interact, often generate a cyclically degenerating climate more

Dec 13 2011

A Process for Building Organizational Synergy

This series is about the impact synergistic working relationships have on the outcomes of organizational change.

Before people can create and maintain synergistic relationships, two things must occur:

  • They must be willing to engage this way with others
  • They must demonstrate the abilities associated with a four-phase model: Interacting, Appreciative Understanding, Integrating, and Implementing[1]

more

Dec 06 2011

The Importance of Synergy During Transformational Change

(3) Comments

No one can whistle a symphony. It takes a whole orchestra to play it.   —H.E. Luccock

A synergistic working relationship is a powerful phenomenon to witness in action—people working together to consume the fewest resources possible to get the job done, while achieving a higher quantity and quality output than if they worked independently. Sponsors, agents, and targets who achieve a high level of synergy stand a much greater chance of realizing their goals during major organizational change. Synergy between change practitioners and clients also accelerates the odds of reaching full realization.

The trouble is, many professional change facilitators lack an in-depth understanding of the underlying dynamics of how synergy works. They hope synergy exists within their client populations, and leverage it when it does, but more

Nov 29 2011

Use Ethical Ploys to Change the World

In this series, I’ve been discussing the use of ethical ploys by practitioners to add value where it is needed, but not solicited. I define an ethical ploy as a “noble ruse” that guides someone toward seeing a point of view he or she might not have otherwise been open to.

In this post, I’d like to present two examples of ethical ploys that highlight the concept of enticing people, in an honorable way, to see more than they asked for or expected from a situation. As you will see, the results of either can have benefits far beyond the realization of the change goals. more

Oct 18 2011

How to Have a Tough Conversation

(3) Comments

You cannot take responsibility for how well another accepts your truth; you can only ensure how well it is communicated. ~Neal Donald Walsch

As change practitioners, we spend a great deal of time learning skills that help us facilitate discussions, guide conversations, and manage relationships with our clients. We hope things go smoothly and that both we and the client have relatively comfortable interactions as the change process unfolds. For the most part, we prefer to avoid any tough, unsettling discussions.

There are times however, when we find ourselves in situations where keeping everything smooth won’t yield the results we need. Sometimes we have to go into a zone that is uncomfortable for the other person. There is no other way, if we want to serve our client and create the value we agreed to provide.

When this happens, it’s important to have a game plan, more

Sep 28 2011

Danger? Opportunity? You Decide.

In this series, I’ve been talking about the importance of being able to reframe a person’s mindset during a change initiative to shift how he or she sees and interprets certain things. There are five key reframing skills:

1. Address the “context” as well as the “content” of interpersonal communications.

2. Redefine the other person’s frame of reference (FOR) in a way that sheds positive light on the successful implementation of the change at hand.

3. Reset the person’s priorities.

4. Respond effectively when the other person reacts to the reframing attempt.

5. Confront the person with the real price it takes to achieve success.

I’ll focus on the fourth skill in this post.

Reframing Skill #4: The Ability to Respond Appropriately Based on the Person’s Reaction

The disruptive nature of major change produces a crisis in the sense that the status quo is no longer viable. The Chinese express the concept of crisis with two symbols.reframing_chinese symbols

The top symbol represents potential danger, the lower, hidden opportunity. By combining the two, the Chinese position change as a paradox. Observing how people respond to the stress produced by the crisis of change reveals two basic orientations that reflect similar characteristics. more

Sep 20 2011

How to Redefine a Person’s Frame of Reference and Reset Priorities

In this series, I’m exploring the importance of being able to reframe a person’s mindset during a change initiative to shift how he or she sees and interprets certain things. There are five reframing skills. I will address skills 2 and 3 in this post, and skills 4 and 5 in subsequent posts.

Reframing Skill #2: The Ability to Redefine the Other Person’s Frame of Reference

A person’s frame of reference (FOR) is made up of six components. You can foster a shift in someone’s FOR by applying one or more of them. more

Jul 13 2011

How to Make Shift Happen

 

In this series, we’ve been exploring the evolution of organizational paradigms. In my last post, I talked about the collapse/renewal phase, the place where either shift “happens” or it “hits the fan.” Here, I’ll pick up with an exploration of what is involved when orchestrating a new paradigm. It requires a four-part approach involving leadership, a learning environment, a new culture, and resilience.

Strong Leadership Is Imperative

Existing paradigms are typically not dissolved by consensus nor by insiders. Usually a single, determined individual or small group with the power to sanction dramatic change throughout an organization concludes that more

Jul 06 2011

The Movement Begins

(1) Comment

The Uncertainty Phase—Time to Shift or…

So far in this series, we’ve explored the meaning of the term “paradigm shift,” and we’ve looked at the first two phases of an organizational paradigm evolution. Now it’s time for us to look at how the actual shift happens, to uncover why the existing paradigm begins to decay.

It’s upsetting to realize that a critical issue (current or anticipated problem or opportunity) cannot be adequately addressed by the existing paradigm and its multitude of fixes. Such a crisis is usually precipitated by more